GOD'S COMPATIBILITY TRIANGLE FOR RELIGION AND SCIENCE
| Hinduism----------| | ||
| (BhagavadGita) | | -Cosmology | |
| Theosophy | | |-Astronomy--Galaxies | |
| Sikhism-----------| | | -Blk.Hol. | |
| -| | | | |
| Buddhism----------| | | -Botany | |
| -| | |-Biology----Protista | |
| Judaism(OT)------| | | -Zoology | |
| -| | | | |
| Christology(OT&NT)|. | |-Chemistry--Inorgan | |
| R.C. & Orthodox--| |
|
| -Organic |
| Protestant-------| |
|
| |
| Anglican | |
|
| -Geology |
| Lutheran | |
|
| -Geophys |
| Methodist | |
|
|-Geoscience-Hydrolo |
| Presbyterian | |
|
| -Mineral. |
| Baptist | |
|
| -Oceanog. |
| United | |
|
| |
| Reformed | |
|
| -Anatomy |
| Pentecostal | |
|
| -Biochem |
| Seven.D.Ad. | |
|
|-HealthSc.--Biophys |
| Mennonite | |
|
| -Pharmaco |
| Others | |
|
| -Physiol. |
| Christ.Science---| |
|
| -Tox.Immu |
| Latter Day S.----| |
|
| |
| Jehovah's Wit.---| |
|
| -Atmosphe |
| -| |
|
| -Elect.Mag |
| Unitarian---------| |
|
|-Physics----Gravity |
| -| |
|
| -Heat&Pres |
| Islam(Qur'an)-----| |
|
| -Light |
| -| |
|
| |
| Baha'i Faith------| |
|
| -Arithmet |
| (Baha'ullah) | |
|
|-Mathemats.-Alg.Calc. |
| Zoroasterian------| |
|
| -Geom.Trig |
| -| |
|
| -Statistic |
| Humanism---------| |
|
| |
| -| | | -Agricult. | |
| Atheism-----------| | | -Computers | |
| -| | |-Applied----Dentist. | |
| Others------------| | | -Engineer. | |
| | -Environ | ||
| | -Medicine | ||
| |-Others |
During December 1996 and January
1997, the following original question was
sent by e-mail within an explanatory
letter, to hundreds of Christians -
laypersons, scientists, ministers,
students - WHAT IS GOD'S ATTITUDE ON
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CHRISTIANITY
AND SCIENCE? Although only 8%
replied and sent one word as
requested, 78% sent the same word -
COMPATIBLE!! Thus GOD considers
Christianity and science are compatible,
as is the case with all other
major religions. I await any challenge to
that conclusion. Comprehensive
analyses to explain the exception of
Christianity must exist and
initiating resolution is possible. The 13
decade plus old argument must
be based on a lack of perception,
misunderstanding, an unwillingness
to consider new ideas and
interpretations, and with some,
a determination to perpetuate the arguing.
Changing one's mind is difficult.
Personal attitude is the key.
Essay #3 'Earth's Old Age Evidence
Confronts the Young Earth Myth' is an
analysis to illustrate the age
of the earth according to Scripture is the
same as by geoscience research.
The conclusion is EARTH IS OLD! Once
agreement exists on that correlation,
then the research results from
astronomical and numerous radiometric
dating techniques, can be used to
establish the absolute dates
for the earth, the planets, the sun, and the
universe.
Rational discussion about EVOLUTION
requires agreement on a comprehensive
and acceptable definition (See
definition in Essay #1). Charles Darwin
apparently was aware that biological
evolution can be understood in
Scripture (see 'Life of Charles
Darwin', F.Darwin ed.,1902,p.42), but
failed to appreciate the significance
relative to his contentious theory.
One relevant point is the Hebrew
word for 'kind', pronounced 'meen', which
occurs ten times in Genesis,
and elsewhere, can be translated as
'species', revealed by three
linguistic scholars of Scripture - Anglican,
R.C.,and Jewish - each using
a different Hebrew-English dictionary.. The
implications should be evident.
In addition, 'speciation', the basic
process of biological evolution,
can be understood in Scripture (See
analysis in Essay #1). For a
literalist that should indicate Truth!! [The
scientific evidence is sufficient
to persuade the evolutionists!!] One
prominent 'anti-evolutionist'
wrote "the Bible does not provide detailed
data but it does provide the
basic principles". I attempted to explain the
basic principle of biological
evolution in Scripture, but his mind was
closed.
If biological evolution can be
understood in Scripture, the basic text for
the Christian faith, then the
endless arguing and mountain of books,
articles, etc., produced over
the last 13 plus decades and counting, the
debates, lawsuits, and legislation
- all has been for nought. From another
perspective, the common occurrence
of biological evolution in Scripture
and science, provides a connecting
bridge between the two. The concept
which has been rejected becomes
the connecting link!!!
As GOD considers Christianity
and science as compatible; as Scripture, and
astronomy and geoscience provide
at the first instance the same age for
earth - OLD; and as Darwin's
biological evolution acts as a bridge between
Scripture and science, then
a willingness to consider new ideas and
be prepared to change
attitude, especially by Christians, will
initiate resolution for a too
long persisting, divisive and fatuous
argument, which has been detrimental
to both Christianity and science. Let
us change a lose-lose relationship,
into a win-win relationship!! Just
contemplate the consequences
for both, and the potential for each sector
of knowledge. The bottom line
is HALLELUJAH!! HURRAH!!, at last - PEACE!!
between the two most influential
philosophies of human knowlege.
Consider a final thought by
Julian Huxley, "Evolution in Action", 1953,
Preface, vii --- Simplification
is sometimes desirable in order to draw
attention to general tendencies.
The subject may become so obscure in a
mass of detail while unifying
principles are lost to sight amongst
contradictory particulars.
-----
Return to Main Page