I reserve the right to alter the assignments up to the
date they are officially assigned/discussed in lab.
Lect/Tut |
Day
|
Duration
|
Start Time
|
End Time
|
Room
|
Instructor/TA
|
Turnitin
ID |
Turnitin
Pass |
Lab/Tutorial
1 |
|
2hrs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lab/Tutorial
2 |
|
2hrs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
:
Material
will typically be handed
in at the beginning of class. There will be a 5%/day penalty for
material handed in late (not including weekends, clock starts "ticking"
at the end of class/lab on the due date). I will not accept assignments
once the papers are
handed back to the rest of the class (if you have a legitimate reason
for not handing in material - e.g., medical - we can reweigh course
components). Unless otherwise
stated,
material should be
presented on letter size paper and stapled together. Please do NOT use
any sort of folder, binder or protective cover (they are cumbersome).
Please see the following policy: http://www.uwo.ca/univsec/handbook/appeals/accommodation_medical.pdf
The Department of Geography has a zero tolerance policy
towards plagiarism. If a student commits plagiarism, the instructor
will assign a grade of zero to the assignment. A second instance of
plagiarism is regarded as a scholastic offense and will be dealt with
according to The University of Western Ontario policy for Scholastic
offenses -
more
on our
policy on plagiarism via this link. The most common
offense is failing to cite properly - if you quote directly, cite the
author! You do not
get the benefit of the doubt (you are not presumed innocent until
proven guilty) when such offenses are committed. That is, the
burden of proof is reversed. Can you prove "it was an
accident" (this is a rhetorical question)? The following
is an excerpt from the university secretariat:
“Scholastic offences are taken seriously and students
are directed to
read the appropriate policy, specifically, the definition of what
constitutes a Scholastic Offence, at the following Web site:
http://www.uwo.ca/univsec/handbook/appeals/scholoff.pdf.
For a full set of regulations please visit this website: http://www.uwo.ca/univsec/handbook/exam/crsout.pdf"
Unfortunately
turnitin has "caught" several offenders in my classes,
please do not be the next one - it is awkward for everyone involved.
If you write and cite properly this tool ensures your paper
is not
marked relative to that of somebody who is plagiarising. The
univerisity has provided this mandatory wording: "All required papers
may be subject to submission for textual
similarity review to the commercial plagiarism detection software under
license to the University for the detection of plagiarism. All papers
submitted will be included as source documents in the reference
database for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of papers subsequently
submitted to the system. Use of the service is subject to the licensing
agreement, currently between The University of Western Ontario and Turnitin.com"
Go to the Timetable
section of the syllabus or see table above for turnitin login
information.
:
If you are curious to know what all the symbols on your marked papers
mean, please go here
to find out - (or the marking link on the main
menu above, left).
Designing a research activity and writing a research
proposal to support that activity are skills that are useful in
numerous contexts, not just in academia. This assignment will involve
planning a research study from initial idea likely contributions.
Each individual student is expected to submit an original
research proposal, although students can share ideas and give
suggestions to one another. By the end of this assignment
you should be able to:
- concisely identify a research problem
- ask a limited number of research questions to address
your research problem
- identify a method for addressing your research
questions
- identify how your reesarch will make contributions to
existing literature/policy
The research done in this class will be done in small groups.
Nevertheless,
individuals must still write and hand in their own original
assignments, including the
proposal, shorter lab assignments, and the final paper. For example,
each individual
can share their data from their individual research
activities to the group for analysis in the final research paper. We
are doing a group project because it
will allow you to experience collaborative research, share results and
experiences during the design and implementation of the research.
This
also provides an opportunity to gain experience in using and analyzing
data from
multiple methods if so desired.
As a group you will need to identify a research problem and
research questions relevant to
the subject of geography that can be at least partially addressed
within the constraints of a thirteen week course. You should pick a
topic that interests you! We will cover several possible examples in
lectures and labs, so start thinking about what you want to do as soon
as possible.
- Title
(1 mark): Should indicate general topic or question.
- Introduction
(2 marks) : This section should give relevant background
information for your research topic. Why does this topic
matter?
- Research
Problem
(2 marks) - Define the problem that will be addressed - this
can
be part of your introduction, but the problem should be clearly
identified within that section (e.g., use a phrase like "the research
problem addressed by
this study is...")
- Research
Questions (3 marks)- Define the research question (s) that
you are investigating.
Clearly define any concepts used.
- Literature
Review (6 marks) - Discuss other geographic research that
has been conducted on your
topic. This should be an overview of the main ideas and
research related to your research topic. Give at least 5 examples,
using a combination of sources (e.g. academic books, peer-reviewed
scientific journal articles). Use proper citation format (i.e. APA
style, see http://www.lib.uwo.ca/files/styleguides/APA.pdf for more
information). Use a periodical or journal database to find journal
articles (http://www.lib.uwo.ca/dbt/a.html). Some examples are GEOBASE,
Web of Science, JSTOR, SOCINDEX and Scholars Portal.
Your literature review should do the following:
- Discuss what is known about this topic,
any gaps/unanswered questions or inconsistencies in the findings to
date.
- Identify what key concepts and / or
theories are relevant, and clearly define any concepts or terms used.
- Discuss what research methods have been
used previously to study this topic.
- Discuss how your research question
contributes, contradicts, challenges, or otherwise has relevance for an
established body of research related to your question. This section
should explain why your research is important.
- Note: in reviewing the scientific
literature, do not summarize each article or book in extensive detail,
but briefly summarize main findings and explain how your research
relates to what is already known about this topic, and what gap in the
research you intend to pursue.
-
Research Design (6 marks) - Describe which design you
intend to use in your research, including
sample size(s) sampling method(s), and research methods. Provide a
clear rationale for design choice. Provide as many details as possible
as to what you intend to do and a rationale for these choices (e.g.
site location, sampling method, research approach).
- Your paper, formal style, title page, refernce list,
proper citation, 12 pt font, double spaced, 2200 wds max.
For Turnitin
login information.
Go to the Timetable
section of the syllabus.
- title page (-1)
- reference list (-1)
- spelling/grammar (-2 max) - up to
two marks can be lost, the first few are free, from then on marks are
deducted at the TA's discretion
- formal style (-2 max) - other
formal style issues (e.g., slang, acronyms, contractions) TA's
discretion
- Turnitin
(-1) - the paper must be submitted to Turnitiin by midnight on the day
the paper is due.
The purpose of the term
project
is to give you experience in the design, implementation, analysis and
write-up of
social scientific research in Geography.
The research done in this class will be a group project.
As a group project, individuals must still write all assignments,
including the proposal, shorter lab assignments, ethical review and
final
paper. However, each individual will share resources within the group:
e.g., literature (e.g., shared dropbox of journal articles),
design, data collection, data etc. . Most groups will be three
people, so you will have a single study but each team member will
write-up the findings in their own way. We are doing a group
project because it will allow you to experience collaborative research,
share results and experiences during the design and implementation of
the research. Though there are a number of credible research designs
that do not involved primary data collection, you will get the most out
of this course if you use some form of primary data collection
(e.g., survey,
interviews, observation).
As a group you will need to identify a research question
relevant to the subject of geography that can be at least partially
addressed within the remainder of the time we have left in the term.
The question must be identified by
in
order for everyone to move forward. Please think about
potential research questions and be prepared to discuss your ideas for
a research project with your peers, the instructor and your TA. Once
your group
has identified a clear research problem and research question(s),
please email it to me
for feedback. You must have
"ethics approval"
from myself before you can begin your data
collection. NOTE: due to the tight timing in the course, we
will ironically allow you to begin your research before your proposal
is submitted. Nevertheless, you will need to be clear how
your research will contribute to knowledge (i.e., do some literature
review work) prior to data collection.
The research project should incorporate at least one research method,
such as: semi-structured interviews, questionnaires (survey),
observation/ethnographic methods, focus groups, discourse
analysis, secondary data analysis. You will be
learning these methods during the course, and trying out some of them
as part of your labs. You and your group members can divide up the
tasks to complete the research. You need to make sure that you allow
time to conduct the research and analyse the data that addresses your
specific research question, in order to complete the final paper.
Your final paper should address your research problem and question(s),
but part of good social science is to reflect on what you
learned so that others can benefit from your experiences. What went
wrong? What
new issues arose? How do your findings link to the literature on this
topic? You may discover that you cannot answer your original question
adequately, due to the limitations of your data; in this case, indicate
what limitations, issues and problems arose during the course of the
research, and how you might conduct the research differently, should
you do another research project.
The final research paper should build on and reflect on the original
research proposal. The first section (introduction and problem
definition) may be very similar to the original proposal, but should
have changes and additions once the research has been completed. The
bulk of the paper should be devoted to a longer description of research
design and data collection methods, results and
discussion/interpretation of the data. Integrate all your research
activities and discuss the results in light of your research question.
Go into depth in your analysis section to assess what you have
learned from the research. Have you answered your research question? If
not, what questions remain? What follow-up research would need to be
addressed?
Note: You can use the same written material from the shorter lab
assignments, but make sure you improve on these assignments. Take our
comments into account.
Each group must:
- have their research problem and question(s) approved
by your TA and me via email.
- receive "ethics
approval" from from the TA or me.
The basis
of this approval will be a one-page
statement about how you
will address: informed consent, minimal risk, confidentiality and
anyonymity (see Marking below).
The following elements will be considered in grading the
content of the paper:
1. Introduction and problem definition (5
marks)
- Clearly stated research question
- Compelling explanation/rationale for the importance
of the research
question, provides adequate background to the topic
- Literature review: at least 5 outside sources of
other studies on this
topic are discussed to explain the need for research on this research
question. Please refer to longer description in the proposal
guidelines. The sources MUST be peer-reviewed scientific journals. Cite
sources appropriately using APA citation format. The textbook is not
considered an outside source. If you did poorly on this section of your
proposal, you will need to show evidence of improving this section to
get full marks.
2. Research design, data
collection and analysis (5 marks)
- Clearly outlined research design including type
(cross sectional,
longitudinal etc) and rationale for the choice of research design
- Thorough description of data
collection carried out (where, when, how, what and by whom)
- Rationale for choice of methods used
- Brief description of analytical
procedures used
- Brief explanation of how the work was
divided amongst the research team
3. Results (20 marks)
- Main findings in relation to your question (s)
- Use visual tools where appropriate (i.e. graphs,
tables, maps) and a
written description
of results that link to each other. Do not just stick a graph in – it
should be referred to in the text, be clearly labeled and link to your
overall question. If you are dealing with text only (e.g.,
interviews, discourse analysis) d graphs and tables may not be
necessary, but a figure that shows how key concepts are linked to other
may be very useful.
- Identification of any gaps, issues
or problems identified with design, methods or results
4. Discussion (15 marks)
- Discussion of the results in relation to your
research question and the research literature. What new knowledge if
any can you contribute to the literature that already exists?
To what extent do your findings:
- corroborate/confirm ;
- contradict;
- tweak;
concepts/findings that
already exist in the literature.
You should also
comment on limitations of your data (keeping in mind that every study
only produces partial knowledge).
5. Conclusion (4 marks)
- Potential implications of your findings for e.g.,
policy, theory.
- Future directions for research.
1. Peer Review
- Completed peer review
form (-1 if omitted - marks
apportioned to other two members)
- Your paper, formal style, title page, refernce list,
proper citation, 12 pt font, double spaced, 2500 wds (approx. 12 pages)
max.
For Turnitin
login information.
Go to the Timetable
section of the syllabus.
- title page (-1)
- reference list (-1)
- spelling/grammar (-2 max) - up to
two marks can be lost, the first few are free, from then on marks are
deducted at the TA's discretion
- formal style (-2 max) - other
formal style issues (e.g., slang, acronyms, contractions) TA's
discretion
- Turnitin
(-1) - the paper must be submitted to Turnitiin by midnight on the day
the paper is due.
In this assignment you will learn about the importance of finding
relevant literature and critically appraising it. Critical
appraisal is a building block of good literature reviews, which are in
turn a major building block of good reasearch design. You
will
focus on critically appraising a journal article - a report about an
empirical study. A key theme of critical appraisal is to
understand that even research that is done well provides only
partial answers. This will help you to start thinking about
the
design of your own study, but challenging you to think about what could
have been done differently.
- Locate an empirical journal article - using the
strategies described
and discussed in lab.
- Critically appraise the article using the critical appraisal
form (copy and paste it into your word processor).
- Submit the completed form to your TA by the beginning
of next lab.
(5% of final grade)
The objective of this assignment is to introduce you to social science
fieldwork. The assignment concerns unobtrusive
observation - observation without engaging with those you observe.
Besides easing you into fieldwork, the goal is for you to
provide
systematic description of behaviour. You will hand in an
individual assignment, but you are expected to work in groups to
collect and share observations. You will have approximatley
1hr
to conduct the observations with the remainder of the time devoted to
planning and follow-up.
Example:
Research Question:
Are women more polite than men in mixed gender conversations?
Hypothesis:
Men will interrupt another speaker in a mixed gender conversation more
than women.
- Read Ch
6 "Structured Observation" prior to lab.
- Select
a series of sites to conduct your observations of human behaviour.
Each individual in the group should observe different people
to
mazimize the number of people studied.
- As a group devise a
research question and an hypothesis (or hypotheses) to test with your
observations. We will dispense with the need for a research
problem this time around - but keep in mind that good social science
should address a relevant social problem. Both structured and
unstructured observation will likely be important.
- Before going
"into the field" have a observation recording plan. How will
you
select people to observe? Will you randomly select people -
e.g.,
every nth person to enter a store? How will you record the
observations? What precisely will you record? In
the above
example, the concepts "interrupt" and "conversation" will
have to
be defined precisely.
- You may decide that a brief period of unstructured
observation is needed prior to solidifying your structured observation
plan.
- Ensure
you have a mechanism for recording unstructured observation throughout
to help make sense of all observations. You will be asked to
write about what you might do differently in your write-up.
- After
the fieldwork is completed - meet back at the lab to discuss and
analyze your observations with your group. If time permits
discuss your findings with the other groups. What are the
patterns that emerged? Do observations differ from one
observer to
the next - and can you account for such differences? Devise a
scheme for sharing the data within the group. If you like you
can
make plans to replicate your study with a more polished observation
plan and more fieldwork at new sites (but this not required).
- Submit (see below) your writeup at the beginning of
next lab.
- Conduct your research in an ethical manner.
The
full report should be 500 words double spaced with a title
page
and an appendix of your structured observations. Please
include
at least the following:
- An introduction indicating the general topic, the
research question and the hypothesis(es).
- Describe the settings (time, place, physical layout,
etc.) in which you performed your observations.
- Describe
the patterns in your findings. Account for things like
unexpected
observations, inconsistencies, and problems in the field.
- Outline what, if any, implications there are from
what you found.
- Provide
some directions for future research in your area of enquiry -
particularly with regards to further unobtrusive observations.
(5% of final grade)
The objective of the next two labs and the assignment is to learn how
to construct and use a
self-administered survey questionnaire. Questionnaires are by
far the
the most common method for gathering social science data for research,
but it is not simply a case of asking a collection of interesting
questions related to a topic. There should be clear links
bewteen the
questions asked and the hypotheses being tested - most survey studies
operate in the deductive logical mode of enquiry. In the lab
you will work
as a group to design
and pre-test
a questionnaire to test hypotheses that are in turn linked back to an
assigned research question. Each individual will take what
they
learn in
the lab to edit their group's questionnaire to your own personal liking
and then write-up the lab to be
handed in on the due date. You will work over two lab
sessions
and
all groups address the following research question:
research question:
What are the key determinants of the use of active modes of transport
for
daily travel?
research problem:
Despite many purported benefits, there is relatively low uptake of
active transport in Canada.
Lab Session 1
- Read
Chs 4 and 5 prior to lab.
- Break into your groups and design a self-administered
questionnaire that is no more than two pages long and measures five different concepts
(besides basic sociodemographic variables like age, gender,
education) plus the dependant variable. This is not as simple
as
it may seem. For example, your
dependant variable will be something that measures "use of active
transport", but you may need multiple questions to distinguish
different
modes of "active transport" - e.g., walking, biking, roller blading.
Since all of
these survey items measure "active transport" this would be considered
one concept. By the way, what does "use" mean? What does
"daily
travel" mean?
- Pay attention to the "rules" for asking questions in
Chapter 5.
- Include elements at the begining to cover ethical
issues: see form 1g003.
- Keep
in mind that because this is self-administered layout matters.
Layout can influence the validity of responses and ultimately
whether or not somebody chooses to complete the questionniare.
- Prepare to pre-test your quesitonnaire.
Create at least
three good copies of
the questionnaire
to be "administered" to one of the other groups - i.e. one copy for
every member of another group - at next week's lab session.
Lab
Session 2
- Your group will be paired with
another group in the lab - exchange questionnaires and "administer"
them as
they would be "in the field" - remember, these are self-administered
not researcher-adminstered questionnaires.
- Both groups then meet
and discuss the questionnaires - share ideas about what
worked and what did not and why.
- Discuss, as a full tutorial group, the advantages and
disadvantages
of various concepts, measures, response modes, general layouts, self
administered vs researcher-administered questionnaires, and any other
relevant issues.
- Edit your questionnaire based on the
experiences in this second lab and your personal preferences (everybody
in your group may hand in a slightly different version) and then submit
as per below.
The
full report should be 500 words double spaced with a title
page
and your questionnaire as an appendix. Please include
at least the following and be sure to use concepts from lectures and
the text where appropriate (e.g. validity, reliability):
- Your revised questionnaire as an appendix.
- The five hypotheses that you would test with your
survey. One for each of your concepts.
- Describe the rationale for the specific concepts in
the hypotheses
and identify how each item in the questionnaire maps on to each concept
in the hypotheses (e.g., "questions 1-4 measure use of active transport,
which is divided into four main sub-dimensions as follows...")
- Outline
the rationale for choosing the measures that you did (i.e. the
questions in the questionnaire) - e.g., by describiing alternative
measures that did not make the final cut. Comment on the
response mode you selected where appropriate - e.g., Likert scales, the
type of Likert scale.
- Summarize the advantages and
disadvantages of conducting this as a self-administered as opposed to
researcher-administered questionnaire.
:
The main objective of this lab is to work with some existing
quantitative survey data to produce results that address specific
research
hypotheses. You will learn some of the basics of bivariate
analysis in SPSS. This exercise should help you refine your
group's
analytical strategies.
- Meet in Geography's Spatial Data Analysis Lab (SDAL)
SSC 1425. for lab this week.
- We
are using the SDAL because SPSS (PASW) is already installed on the
machines. If you want to use your laptop and SPSS is not on
your
computer, use Windows Remote Desktop to access UWO SSCNET
- which is a virtual machine that has SPSS for this lab and NVivo for
next lab.
- Open this webpage on the remote machine.
- Download the data
<<<right click, "save as/target" - to the desktop
(on the remote machine if you are using the remote desktop).
- Open the data with SPSS/PASW by double clicking the
file wherever you saved it. Two windows will open.
- Open this
file with instructions about what to do in SPSS.
You will generate one bar chart and some statistical output
related to some hypotheses.
- If you are new to SPSS or need a refresher, these two
videos should help
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADDR3_Ng5CA
and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4CWeHF3Mn00
- A list or table of your hypotheses numbered so they
can be linked to what follows.
- A brief rationale for your hypotheses (e.g,. existing
research - Baxter and Greenlaw, or some reasonable logic)
- Your graph.
- A
summary table with your Chi Square, Spearman Correlation, and
Significance values. This table should be linked to your
hyotheses table, or perhaps include the information for items 1 and 4
in the same table?
- A brief statement about what conclusions can be drawn
from your statistics.
- A
comment on the role of the don't know/refused category for many of the
variables. How could this category be handled differently?
- The
full report should be 500 words max. double spaced with a
title
page and reference(s) where appropriate - tables and figure are not
part of the word count. Be sure to use concepts from lectures
and
the text where appropriate (e.g. dependant variable, p-value).
:
The main goal of this lab is to work in your groups and distinguish
research problems, research questions, concepts and methods.
You
will also be asked to start thinking about the justification/rationale
for your basic design choice, and the likely limitations of this
design choice.
- Read the material for lecture and lab and review your
lecture notes.
- Identify the research problem.
- State no more than three research questions to
address the problem (make sure each is clear, ethical and feasible).
- Identify at least 2 key concepts/variables that you
will need to define and measure related to the research question.
- Identify the method you feel will be most appropriate
(ethical, feasible, relation to theory - inductive? deductive?).
- Identify
some limitations of this method for addressing your research
problem+question(s) (despite the fact that it still may be the "best"
method).
- Group to submit a document approximately
400
words to TA (appoint a designate). Once the TA
feels your
idea is okay to proceed, then submit your revised 400 word max.
document to me. This document needs to be approved
before
you can move on to ethics
approval.
:
Before you start your
research you need to submit
one copy of your completed ethics form(s) for your group's project to
your TA
and Cced to me (we are your "ethics board") for
approval. Allow up
to a week for
a response. Be prepared to have to address comments and
resubmit
- this is the rule more than it is the exception with our university's
non-medical research ethics board. From submission to
approval
could take up to
a couple of weeks. The lesson is, submit in a timely manner!
Though
a lab slot has been reserved for completing the ethics forms, you can
fill these out and get approval any time throughout the term.
Do
not leave it too late, be mindful of the final report deadline and the
fact you have to collect analyse and write-up the data.
You
should start the online CORE module asap!
The main goal of this lab is to fill out your group's
ethics form and
get it approved and sent to me after lab. This can be done
ahead
of time, in which case your group can focus on practical matters that
will get you out collecting data as soon as possible - it is November
already!
- Please complete the TriCouncil
Policy Statement on Ethics 2 CORE module (takes about 3 hrs,
at your leisure).
- All groups need to fill out form 1f002 (see
resources section of Owl).
- If your group is doing survey work fill out form
1g003
(see resources section of Owl)
- If your group is doing interview work, fill
out form 1i001 (see resources
section of Owl)
- Work with your TA to produce an "ethical" field
strategy to submit to me for final approval.
- If
time permits work as a group to prepare futher for your fieldwork e.g.,
practice interviews, refine your survey questionnaire etc.
:
The purpose of this lab is to learn i) how qualitative data are
reported in a journal article; ii) how qualitative data anysis software
- NVivo - can be used to assist qualitative data analysis; iii) how to
analyse semi-structured interview text by attaching themes (nodes) the
sections of text using NVivo. Keep in mind that the
"researcher-as-instrument" role does not stop once you start using
qualitative data software to asist analysis - quit the contrary - it is
your abiliity to think and interpret - in our case, conversations
- that makes qualitative analysis effective. Some
qualitative research projects involved several participants, thousands
of pages of text and then write-up may only provide 10-20
quotations total. This lab explores how large amounts of
textual
(or other) data can be condensed into a few key concepts and
quotations. Unlike statistical analysis, the data do not tell
you
what procedure is appropriate (e.g., what statistical test to use.
Qualitative analysis is both murky and intensely rewarding.
- Read the Chapter 14 on Qualitative Analysis.
Have a look
a the journal article posted on Sakai for this lab. Read the
interview posted on Sakai.
- Meet in the SDAL SSC1425 again this week - we will be
using the computers again.
- Bring a set of headphones if available (you may want
to re-watch NVivo tutorials)
- Have a look at what the finished product of a
qualitative
project looks like - look over the reading posted on Sakai for this
lab. Use this as a model for how you might write up
qualitative
findings.
- Watch the following tutorials as a group (all
tutorials can be found at the link above): Tutorial 5 - Work
with interviews, articles and other documents; Tutorial 6 -
Organize material in to themes with coding; Tutorial 9 - Finding
themes and analyzing text; and Tutorial 8 - Explore
your coding. (if for some reason you could not attend lab, Tutorial 1
will likely be the best place to start.
- Read
the interview provided on Sakai and start thinking about themes in the
text. If you prefer to get started with your own data, go
ahead
and import one of your own trascribed interviews instead. The
only disadvantage to this is that you will not have an existing list of
codes/nodes to work with (not necessarily a bad thing).
- Open
NVivo on SSCNET. Use the Remote Desktop Connection utiility
in
windows (see all programs/accessories) to access SSCNET. That
is
type "SSCNET" in the computer field, then press "connect". I
believe we only have about 10 licences, so you may have to work in
pairs.
- Import the interview into NVivo, by first saving it
from Sakai to your remote desktop.
- Code
the interview using NVivo (attach nodes to sections of text).
Though there are existing "nodes" available, create some of
your
own that make sense within the context of this study. Your
TAs
will provide a general research question to help guide your thinking
about coding. This is a very new and different process for
many
of us, so it will be slow at first. Take some time to try
some of
the advanced features in NVivo - like text queries, tag clouds
- Don't
let frustration get the better of you...yes, that is a "task" for this
lab and for your project analysis if you have interview data.
At
the end of the day, your goal in qualitative analysis is to identify a
few key concepts that "emerge" from what the participants said, and use
quotations to represent those concepts. All of the other
(potentially confusing) features contained in NVivo may help you
visuallize the data, but beware of getting lost in these "bells and
whistles"
|